Ultrasound Image Fusion: A New Strategy to Reduce X-Ray Exposure During Image Guided Pain Therapies

Many pain procedures cannot reliably be performed with a blind technique. Thus, imaging guidance is frequently mandatory, above all when the region of interest is deep and/or difficult to reach. In recent years new imaging techniques have been developed to improve diagnosis and to display greater anatomical details. Both Radiology and Pain Therapy have developed new and more accurate techniques in interventional pain, linked to a better understanding of pathophysiology and mechanisms of pain. There are many important anesthetic blocks performed under ultrasound guidance, but our experience is manly based on pudendal nerve and sacro-iliac joint infiltration

Influence of subjects characteristics and technical variables on muscle stiffness measured by shear wave elastosonography

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to quantitatively assess lower limbs muscle elasticity in a court of healthy subjects and to evaluate the influence of technical variables (e.g., diameter of the ROI-region of interest) and examined subjects' characteristics (e.g., sex, levels of physical activity, side evaluated) on muscle stiffness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 54 healthy subjects (48 men, 6 women) were evaluated for a total of 108 lower limbs. Shear wave elastography was performed with a multifrequency linear probe (15-4 MHz). Two radiologists performed the evaluation of lower limbs from left to right side (first calf and then thigh). The measures were taken on gastrocnemius and on femoral biceps muscle belly. We chose to place for this study two ROIs of 4 and 2 mm of diameter. RESULTS: The mean muscle stiffness was 1.98 ± 0.48 (range between 1.89 ± 0.36 and 2.15 ± 0.57 m/s). The difference in muscle stiffness between left and right side of the body and between different levels of physical activity never became statistically significant (p value between 0.314 and 0.915). Only in one test out of eight the difference of muscle stiffness between male and female resulted statistically significant (p value 0.020). When comparing the measurement obtained with a 2 and 4 mm diameter ROIs the values were statistically different only for the left thigh (p value 0.028). CONCLUSION: Our study, despite its limitations (low sample and low female population), seems to give some clear advice: physiological or technical factors do not determine statistically significant differences on passive muscle stiffness

Role of cardiac magnetic resonance in the differential diagnosis between arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular involvement and previous infectious myocarditis

Aims: Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular involvement (ACM-LV), particularly in case of isolated left ventricular involvement (i.e. left dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, LDAC) and previous infectious myocarditis (pIM) may have overlapping clinical and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) features. To date, there are no validated CMR criteria for the differential diagnosis between these conditions. The present study aimed to identify CMR characteristics to distinguish ACM-LV from pIM. Methods and results: This observational, retrospective, single-centre study included 30 pIM patients and 30 ACM-LV patients. In ACM-LV patients CMR was performed at diagnosis; in patients with pIM, CMR was performed six months after acute infection. CMR analysis included quantitative assessment of left ventricle (LV) volumes, systolic function and wall thicknesses, qualitative and quantitative assessment of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences. Compared with pIM, ACM-LV patients showed slightly larger LV volumes, more frequent regional wall motion anomalies and reduced wall thicknesses. ACM-LV patients had higher amounts of LV LGE and extension. Notably, the LDAC subgroup had the highest amount of LV LGE. LV LGE amount > 15 g and a LV LGE percentage > 30% of LV mass discriminated ACM-LV from pIM with a 100% specificity. LGE segmental distribution was superimposable among the groups, except for septal segments that were more frequently involved in ACM-LV and LDAC patients. Conclusions: A great extension of LV LGE (a cut-off of LGE >15 g and a percentage above 30% of LV LGE in relation to total myocardial mass) discriminates ACM-LV from pIM with extremely high specificity